Export limit exceeded: 416864 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2089 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-9546 | 5 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 2 more | 42 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Active Iq Unified Manager and 39 more | 2026-10-07 | 9.8 Critical |
| FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.hadoop.shaded.com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariConfig (aka shaded hikari-config). | ||||
| CVE-2019-16943 | 6 Debian, Fasterxml, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 36 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Fedora and 33 more | 2026-10-07 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the p6spy (3.8.6) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of com.p6spy.engine.spy.P6DataSource mishandling. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8851 | 2 Node-uuid Project, Redhat | 2 Node-uuid, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| node-uuid before 1.4.4 uses insufficiently random data to create a GUID, which could make it easier for attackers to have unspecified impact via brute force guessing. | ||||
| CVE-2021-29425 | 5 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 2 more | 69 Commons Io, Debian Linux, Active Iq Unified Manager and 66 more | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Apache Commons IO before 2.7, When invoking the method FileNameUtils.normalize with an improper input string, like "//../foo", or "\\..\foo", the result would be the same value, thus possibly providing access to files in the parent directory, but not further above (thus "limited" path traversal), if the calling code would use the result to construct a path value. | ||||
| CVE-2019-17267 | 5 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 2 more | 21 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Active Iq Unified Manager and 18 more | 2026-10-07 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to net.sf.ehcache.hibernate.EhcacheJtaTransactionManagerLookup. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16935 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Python and 1 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Python and 3 more | 2026-10-07 | 6.1 Medium |
| The documentation XML-RPC server in Python through 2.7.16, 3.x through 3.6.9, and 3.7.x through 3.7.4 has XSS via the server_title field. This occurs in Lib/DocXMLRPCServer.py in Python 2.x, and in Lib/xmlrpc/server.py in Python 3.x. If set_server_title is called with untrusted input, arbitrary JavaScript can be delivered to clients that visit the http URL for this server. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0235 | 4 Debian, Node-fetch Project, Redhat and 1 more | 14 Debian Linux, Node-fetch, Acm and 11 more | 2026-10-07 | 6.1 Medium |
| node-fetch is vulnerable to Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor | ||||
| CVE-2022-42003 | 5 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 2 more | 23 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 20 more | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| In FasterXML jackson-databind before versions 2.13.4.1 and 2.12.17.1, resource exhaustion can occur because of a lack of a check in primitive value deserializers to avoid deep wrapper array nesting, when the UNWRAP_SINGLE_VALUE_ARRAYS feature is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18074 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication and missing authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18095 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 8.5 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18114 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary files due to improper path canonicalization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18123 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 7.6 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to the improper use of reflection with externally controlled input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18124 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18131 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated user's browser due to improper neutralization of HTML input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18132 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized payment mutation actions due to missing authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18133 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify server files due to path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18134 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90996 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 4 Sssd, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-07 | 4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in sssd. A local unprivileged user could send a specially crafted request with a zero-length body to the Network Security Services (NSS) responder. This could lead to a denial-of-service condition, causing the NSS responder to become unstable or terminate. This vulnerability affects the availability of the system responder. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87114 | 1 Redhat | 4 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform, Pdrive Lightspeed and 1 more | 2026-10-07 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in kube-compare. When processing a 'container://' reference path, the tool incorrectly executes an untrusted container image's entrypoint instead of merely extracting data from a stopped container. This allows a remote attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the operator's workstation. If the Docker daemon requires elevated privileges, the untrusted code may execute with root-mediated daemon privileges, posing a significant security risk. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90462 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Sssd | 5 Sssd, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 2 more | 2026-10-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in SSSD. When configured with the LDAP access provider and `ldap_access_order` including `ppolicy` or `lockout`, a fail-open condition in the LDAP ppolicy access check can occur if a user lookup returns zero results. This can incorrectly return success and cache an allow decision, permitting continued authorization for a deleted or deprovisioned user. A remote attacker with prior valid account context could exploit this to maintain access to information and potentially make limited modifications to resources that should no longer be available. | ||||