| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Improper system call parameter validation in the Trusted OS may allow a malicious driver to perform mapping or unmapping operations on a large number of pages, potentially resulting in kernel memory corruption. |
| Improper initialization of CPU cache memory could allow a privileged attacker with hypervisor access to overwrite SEV-SNP guest memory resulting in loss of data integrity. |
| Insufficient validation within Xilinx Run Time framework could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges from user space to kernel space, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and/or availability. |
| Insufficient parameter validation while allocating process space in the Trusted OS (TOS) may allow for a malicious userspace process to trigger an integer overflow, leading to a potential denial of service. |
| Improper input validation in Satellite Management Controller (SMC) may allow an attacker with privileges to use certain special characters in manipulated Redfish® API commands, causing service processes like OpenBMC to crash and reset, potentially resulting in denial of service. |
| Improper handling of direct memory writes in the input-output memory management unit could allow a malicious guest virtual machine (VM) to flood a host with writes, potentially causing a fatal machine check error resulting in denial of service. |
| A DLL hijacking vulnerability in AMD StoreMI™ could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper input validation in the system management mode (SMM) could allow a privileged attacker to overwrite arbitrary memory potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution at the SMM level. |
| Improper access control in secure encrypted virtualization (SEV) could allow a privileged attacker to write to the reverse map page (RMP) during secure nested paging (SNP) initialization, potentially resulting in a loss of guest memory confidentiality and integrity. |
| Improper handling of parameters in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) could allow a privileged attacker to pass an arbitrary memory value to functions in the trusted execution environment resulting in arbitrary code execution |
| Improper input validation in AMD Power Management Firmware (PMFW) could allow a privileged attacker from Guest VM to send arbitrary input data potentially causing a GPU Reset condition. |
| Improper input validation in the AMD Graphics Driver could allow an attacker to supply a specially crafted pointer, potentially leading to arbitrary writes or denial of service. |
| Improper handling of error condition during host-induced faults can allow a local high-privileged attack to selectively drop guest DMA writes, potentially resulting in a loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity |
| An unintended proxy or intermediary in the AMD power management firmware (PMFW) could allow a privileged attacker to send malformed messages to the system management unit (SMU) potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| The security state of the calling processor into Trusted Firmware (TF-A) is not used and could potentially allow non-secure processors access to secure memories, access to crypto operations, and the ability to turn on and off subsystems within the SOC. |
| An integer overflow in the SMU could allow a privileged attacker to potentially write memory beyond the end of the reserved dRAM area resulting in loss of integrity or availability. |
| Improper handling of insufficiency privileges in the ASP could allow a privileged attacker to modify Translation Map Registers (TMRs) potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality or integrity. |
| Improper isolation of shared resources on System-on-a-chip (SOC) could a privileged attacker to tamper with the contents of the PSP reserved DRAM region potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality and integrity. |
| Type confusion in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) could allow an attacker to pass a malformed argument to the External Global Memory Interconnect Trusted Agent (XGMI TA) leading to a memory safety violation potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. |
| Improper input validation in system management mode (SMM) could allow a privileged attacker to overwrite stack memory leading to arbitrary code execution. |
